Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



nodata wrote:
> > | [angenenr@localhorst tmp]$rpm -v -K zsh-4.2.0-3.i386.rpm
> > | zsh-4.2.0-3.i386.rpm:
> > |     Header V3 DSA signature: OK, key ID 4f2a6fd2
> > |     Header SHA1 digest: OK (4bd8d06387d5c7175b60bf200fb84a229d79b7d4)
> > |     MD5 digest: OK (16cc40302ebfd42dc2bc1d7f47cd7ded)
> > |     V3 DSA signature: OK, key ID 4f2a6fd2
> >
> > Seems to be signed also.
> 
> Fedora Core test (rawhide) isn't signed.
> 
> Why?

I just downloaded that zsh-RPM from the development-Tree.

Ralph

Attachment: pgpfYfv0P8zUf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]