Re: Thoughts welcome: interface between automated test gating and the "critical path"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 09:37 -0400, pmkellly@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > Second, since nobody really opposed the idea of extending the critpath
> > definition slightly, here's a formal proposal to implement that. I want
> > to edit the wiki critpath page:
> >
> > 
> > and change it as follows:
> > 
> > 1. Under Background, change "The packages required to sustain these
> > actions make up the critical path." to:
> > 
> > "The packages required to sustain these actions initially made up the
> > critical path. Later, it was agreed that the maintainers of Editions,
> > spins, and labs can also declare packages that provide other key
> > functionality to be part of the ''critical path'' for that Edition,
> > spin or lab."
> > 
> > 2. Under Actions, change the first two sentences to read:
> > 
> > "Packages required to perform the most fundamental actions on a system
> > are always considered part of the ''critical path''. Those actions
> > include: "
> > 
> > Does anyone object to these proposed changes? Thanks!
> I think this is a great improvement over what we had.

So, I just realized I never actually made these changes! I've just done
so now:
I also updated the information on how critpath is generated and how you
can view it, as that all changed as part of this too.
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:
Do not reply to spam, report it:

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux