Re: Make Flatpak support explicit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 6:05 AM Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Anyone else, thoughts on listing Flatpak explicitly in [0]?

My interpretation is that Flatpak is already covered implicitly, in
the same way that RPMs are. The careful reader will notice that "rpm"
doesn't appear there except in "rpm-ostree", but no one would argue
that the criterion doesn't cover managing RPMs. That said, there's
some benefit to being explicit. I suppose my take is "sure, I guess."



-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux