Re: is an accidentally reverted Fedora feature/change a blocker?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sat, Dec 18, 2021, 1:17 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

But it does seem like we should have _some_ set of automated testing that's
linked to intentional, acccepted changes. Nano-as-default in Fedora Server
is another one.

Yeah, nano also vanished from Server edition in the 35 cycle. Once discovered, since nothing was actually broken, it was already too late.

--
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux