Re: is an accidentally reverted Fedora feature/change a blocker?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 09:09:17AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> However, I think there'd be a solid case for FESCo to take anything
> like this as a blocker, and procedurally that makes more sense too -
> Changes are under FESCo's remit. So if a case like this is caught
> before release, I'd say file a FESCo ticket asking them to consider it
> as a blocker.

This makes sense to me. It might also make sense for big changes to also
include proposed updates to the validation criteria, just as modern software
development expects new features to come with tests for those features.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux