On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 18:21 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > Proposed changes to the Desktop release criteria for ARM and AArch64 in Fedora 32: > > > > * drop Xfce on 32-bit ARM from release blocking desktops > > > > * add Workstation on AArch64 to release blocking desktops > > > > > > I am not following recent developments of chap arm based mini computers (read: Raspberry Pis and alike), hence my question might be a bit stupid here, but isn't Workstation a bit too resource-consuming for devices our users are likely to run Fedora "desktop" on? I'm fine if we are targeting the AArch64 based laptops, but are we OK with recommending either Workstation or non-bocking spins for arm devices with less than 4GB RAM? > > > > Are there significant resource consumption differences between GNOME > > and GNOME Classic? Would GNOME Classic by default on aarch64 be a > > valid option? > > My understanding is that Classic is purely a look and feel thing. Me too, more or less. They're still both composited by GNOME Shell. Maybe Classic uses fewer 3D effects, but I doubt that's going to make a significant difference. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
