Re: Kernel Tainted errors in fully updates F31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/15/20 1:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 6:05 AM pmkellly@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<pmkellly@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 1/13/20 2:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:

In regard to the TPM2 issue:

Did you read the bug I cited?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769215


Yes, this bug seems to be the exact problem I have. It doesn't matter if
it's turned on or off.


It's supposed to be fixed now. If you're seeing something different
than what's reported in that bug, then it needs a new bug filed. If
it's the same thing, you need to let them know what version you're
using and that it's not fixed.


I have not implemented the fix. I am reluctant to do such things on user
machines. I followed your example and removed the tpm2-abrmd packages
from those machines. I'll monitor for the released fix I doubt that
reinstalling it will be useful. The complaint in the journal is that
those machines have TPM1.2 instead of TMP2. Right now I'm thinking I
won't bother reinstalling it. Unless you know of a reason that it would
be good to do so. I may have to budget for some newer machines.

Good firmware would require vendor signed firmware updates. I have no
idea how that's actually verified, and if some implementations
leverage the TPM for that, and what minimum version is required. But
I'd say even if your machines aren't supported by fwupd for firmware
updates, you can still apply them however the manufacturer normally
provides, and that is recommended.

Otherwise, right now, I don't think we're leveraging the TPM for anything else.


I get the fwupd on these machines, but from what I've read the TMP is a separate chip on these machines and is not programmable. I checked the Lenovo web site under support and for these models. The page starts out with an "Out of Support" banner. Though there is a BIOS update available (only implemented through Windows), there is no TPM update available. They do seem to make TPM updates for the newer machines. Oh well back to budgeting for newer machines. I can't really complain. I bought these for a little over $100 each as manufacturer rehabbed about 7 years ago. Now I'll just buy some rehabbed i3s or i5s. These can be repurposed for something where TPM doesn't matter. They still run fine after all.
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux