On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 13:29 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > What are your thoughts? Does the proposal sound reasonable? Would you > change something? Would you use a different backend system? Have I > forgotten something important? Feedback welcome. So overall I agree with a lot of what you wrote. It does cause me to wonder if writing some kind of plugin/extension for Pagure, or just writing the functionality into the blockerbugs app, might possibly be *less* work than writing and maintaining the 'blocker bot', however. My other concern would be that if we use something other than the blockerbugs app or Bugzilla, we now have *three* different systems involved in the blocker review process - Bugzilla, the blockerbugs app, and the discussion system. That seems like a lot of moving parts to keep synchronized. Thanks for working on this! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
