Re: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



19/11/28 17:13(e)an, Adam Williamson igorleak idatzi zuen:

On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 13:29 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
What are your thoughts? Does the proposal sound reasonable? Would you
change something? Would you use a different backend system? Have I
forgotten something important? Feedback welcome.
So overall I agree with a lot of what you wrote. It does cause me to
wonder if writing some kind of plugin/extension for Pagure, or just
writing the functionality into the blockerbugs app, might possibly be
*less* work than writing and maintaining the 'blocker bot', however. My
other concern would be that if we use something other than the
blockerbugs app or Bugzilla, we now have *three* different systems
involved in the blocker review process - Bugzilla, the blockerbugs app,
and the discussion system. That seems like a lot of moving parts to
keep synchronized.
pagure supports third-party themes|plugins , src.fp.o uses both for custom features (anitya integration for example), we could do something similar on pagure.io, where we are already using a downstream theme but not plugin
Thanks for working on this!
--
Julen Landa Alustiza
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux