Bugzilla Bug 1644439 looks identical, but was not investigated further as it seems the issue did not appear anymore and dnf has changed since reported.
This is what I have found so far.
dnf system-upgrade -v reboot fails with the following errors:
2019-10-03T11:28:47Z INFO Downloading Packages:
2019-10-03T11:28:51Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/updates-testing-9640951d8a5b54c9/packages/plasma-integration-5.16.5
-2.fc31.x86_64.rpm
2019-10-03T11:28:51Z CRITICAL Package "plasma-integration-5.16.5-2.fc31.x86_64" from repository "updates-testing" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-03T11:28:53Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/LabPlot-2.5.0-5.fc31.x86_64.rpm
2019-10-03T11:28:53Z CRITICAL Package "LabPlot-2.5.0-5.fc31.x86_64" from repository "fedora" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-03T11:28:54Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/cantor-19.04.3-2.fc31.x86_64.rpm
2019-10-03T11:28:54Z CRITICAL Package "cantor-19.04.3-2.fc31.x86_64" from repository "fedora" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-03T11:28:54Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/cantor-libs-19.04.3-2.fc31.x86_64.
rpm
2019-10-03T11:28:54Z CRITICAL Package "cantor-libs-19.04.3-2.fc31.x86_64" from repository "fedora" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-03T11:29:01Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/plasma-desktop-5.16.4-1.fc31.x86_6
4.rpm
2019-10-03T11:29:01Z CRITICAL Package "plasma-desktop-5.16.4-1.fc31.x86_64" from repository "fedora" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-03T11:29:01Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/plasma-lookandfeel-fedora-5.16.4-1
.fc31.noarch.rpm
2019-10-03T11:29:01Z CRITICAL Package "plasma-lookandfeel-fedora-5.16.4-1.fc31.noarch" from repository "fedora" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-03T11:29:01Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/plasma-workspace-5.16.4-1.fc31.x86
_64.rpm
2019-10-03T11:29:01Z CRITICAL Package "plasma-workspace-5.16.4-1.fc31.x86_64" from repository "fedora" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-03T11:29:01Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/sddm-breeze-5.16.4-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
2019-10-03T11:29:01Z CRITICAL Package "sddm-breeze-5.16.4-1.fc31.noarch" from repository "fedora" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-03T11:29:03Z DDEBUG Cleaning up.
2019-10-03T11:29:03Z SUBDEBUG
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 65, in main
return _main(base, args, cli_class, option_parser_class)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 98, in _main
return cli_run(cli, base)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 122, in cli_run
ret = resolving(cli, base)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 166, in resolving
base.do_transaction(display=displays)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 224, in do_transaction
self.download_packages(install_pkgs, self.output.progress, total_cb)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 1133, in download_packages
remote_pkgs, local_repository_pkgs = self._select_remote_pkgs(pkglist)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 2474, in _select_remote_pkgs
_('Some packages have invalid cache, but cannot be downloaded due to '
dnf.exceptions.Error: Some packages have invalid cache, but cannot be downloaded due to "--cacheonly" option
2019-10-03T11:29:03Z CRITICAL Error: Some packages have invalid cache, but cannot be downloaded due to "--cacheonly" option
As someone already suspected, the rpms were not downloaded and therefore produces the above error.
They are not downloaded because dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --allowerasing --releasever=31 does not list them as to be installed.
It only lists older versions to be removed:
Removing dependent packages:
....
plasma-desktop 5.15.5-1.fc30
sddm-breeze 5.15.5-1.fc30
plasma-workspace 5.15.5-1.fc30
plasma-lookandfeel-fedora 5.15.5-1.fc30
cantor-libs 18.12.3-1.fc30
cantor 18.12.3-1.fc30
LibPlot 2.5.0-3.fc30
.....
But no new versions to be installed.
So there seems to be a mismatch between what dependencies --download resolves and what gets resolved after system-upgrade reboot.
Also interesting that Alan's failed packages are almost the same as mine. So may be it is related to some wrongly defined dependencies for them.
Before I dive deeper into what system-upgrade is exactly doing, is there a hint where to check next?
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, 3. October 2019 19:04, Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-10-02 at 14:34 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 10/2/19 2:31 PM, Alan wrote:
> >
> > > Oct 02 11:23:19 daimajin dnf[1390]: Error opening file for
> > > checksum:
> > > /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-
> > > 3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/plasma-
> > > desktop-5.16.4-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
> > > Oct 02 11:23:19 daimajin dnf[1390]: Package "plasma-desktop-5.16.4-
> > > 1.fc31.x86_64" from repository "fedora" has incorrect checksum
> >
> > That's weird, can you check if those files actually exist?
>
> They don't!
>
> I reran it after clearing all the packages and upgrade packages and
> data and reran it and got the same results. It passes all the
> transaction tests. Everything claims to be OK for the upgrade, but
> those files don't exists for some unknown reason.
>
> Could it be some corruption in the rpm database?
>
> test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
