On Wed, 2019-10-02 at 14:34 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/2/19 2:31 PM, Alan wrote: > > Oct 02 11:23:19 daimajin dnf[1390]: Error opening file for > > checksum: > > /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora- > > 3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/plasma- > > desktop-5.16.4-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm > > Oct 02 11:23:19 daimajin dnf[1390]: Package "plasma-desktop-5.16.4- > > 1.fc31.x86_64" from repository "fedora" has incorrect checksum > > That's weird, can you check if those files actually exist? They don't! I reran it after clearing all the packages and upgrade packages and data and reran it and got the same results. It passes all the transaction tests. Everything claims to be OK for the upgrade, but those files don't exists for some unknown reason. Could it be some corruption in the rpm database? _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
