Re: proposal: move "image size" criterion from Beta to Final

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:35 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I like this approach better than just moving the criterion to Final
> because in cases of large overages, the package gymnastics that might
> be required to make it work could prove to be pretty impactful. I'd
> have a lot more confidence in our ability to deliver a good experience
> to our users if we're trying to trim half a gig from an image before
> Beta than if we're doing it on the Monday before Go/No-Go.

>From Go/No-Go
17:16:12 <adamw> i mean, technically we knew about it, the script has
been filing the results in the wiki religiously
17:16:17 <adamw> we just sort of forgot to notice and file a bug

Is it possible for this script, or Pungi, to grow the ability to file
a bug or send email to the responsible party? I'm not opposed to any
of the ideas floated so far, but I rather like the idea of hassling QA
less with this. It's an automatic blocker so ideally it should
directly notify the responsible party.

-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux