+1 On September 17, 2019 10:34:25 PM GMT+02:00, Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 9:55 AM Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Considering this, I believe it makes sense to move the current >criterion from Beta to Final. >> >I'd be okay with letting the responsible team specify a buffer they're >willing to accept for Beta (e.g. so Workstation might say "we can >allow 10% over our specified limit" and Server can say "if we go over >the DVD won't burn, so what's the point?") In other words, any overage >would be an automatic blocker, but teams can optionally pre-approve >exceptions. This way, teams can still make determinations that are in >the best interests of the deliverable they're targeting, but we don't >end up in a position we're slipping a week because a deliverable is 5 >bytes larger than desired. > >I like this approach better than just moving the criterion to Final >because in cases of large overages, the package gymnastics that might >be required to make it work could prove to be pretty impactful. I'd >have a lot more confidence in our ability to deliver a good experience >to our users if we're trying to trim half a gig from an image before >Beta than if we're doing it on the Monday before Go/No-Go. Julen Landa Alustiza <jlanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
