On 8/29/19 2:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 20:15 +0200, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: >> Could we go on a more generic fashion? >> >> Something like "Supported container engines must work on their basic >> features on all the blocker deliverables were they are installed by >> default" >> >> Our supported engines are, podman? cri-o? > We could, but I think it's only necessary if there are either a *lot* > of criteria and/or we decide to have more than one. > > Matthew, Dusty, any thoughts on whether we would want to support any > beyond podman? So far docker and cri-o have been brought up. My guess > would be we'd probably want podman and not docker, but I'm not sure > about cri-o... Well CRI-O and Kubernetes are not ready for the CGRoupsV2 change, Nor is Moby. I would say podman and buildah should work. We need changes upstream to get the other packages to be supported. _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
