On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 20:15 +0200, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > Could we go on a more generic fashion? > > Something like "Supported container engines must work on their basic > features on all the blocker deliverables were they are installed by > default" > > Our supported engines are, podman? cri-o? We could, but I think it's only necessary if there are either a *lot* of criteria and/or we decide to have more than one. Matthew, Dusty, any thoughts on whether we would want to support any beyond podman? So far docker and cri-o have been brought up. My guess would be we'd probably want podman and not docker, but I'm not sure about cri-o... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
