I have the same doubts about the 7. Well, nobody is sure ;) +1 on my side, great work Pat & Adam On August 14, 2019 7:33:03 PM GMT+02:00, Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:26 PM Adam Williamson ><adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> If we say 3 days, then we're committing to doing all of that for a >> blocker that's proposed the Sunday before the go/no-go - one day >before >> the final blocker review meeting. Which, I mean...yeah, we have time >to >> do all that. Juuust barely. :) >> >I mean, it seems like we do that now anyway. I'm definitely okay with >you saying "yes, but the status quo is still kinda terrible." And I'm >okay with finding a bug and not being able to fix it in time for it to >be in the RC. What I don't want happening is for a bug to pop up just >before the meeting so that we end up spending half of of the go/no-go >meeting trying to reproduce the bug report. > >> I dunno, it's hard to be sure what number is right exactly. > >Only because there's no right answer. :-) I'm fine with choosing 7 >days as a starting point. If that's the only area of disagreement on >this proposal, then I'd say you've done pretty well. Julen Landa Alustiza <jlanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
