On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 22:09 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:36 PM Harold Dost <harolddost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome? Similar to another blocker that was being proposed, maybe it's not something that _must_ be tested, but if it's known to be broken that it should block a final. Maybe I'm missing something, but unless the image is over the capacity of a DVD, what would prevent the success of an installation? > > We did have a bug a couple years ago or so, where the ISO written to > USB booted fine, but when burned to optical media wouldn't boot > anything including VM. It was a bootloader bug, if I recall correctly > - pretty sure it hit BIOS firmware only, not UEFI. IIRC it would even boot when attached as a 'virtual' disc to a VM - it was only when actually written to physical spinning discs that it failed to work. That was a fun bug. For the record: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141496 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148087 -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
