On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:36 PM Harold Dost <harolddost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome? Similar to another blocker that was being proposed, maybe it's not something that _must_ be tested, but if it's known to be broken that it should block a final. Maybe I'm missing something, but unless the image is over the capacity of a DVD, what would prevent the success of an installation? We did have a bug a couple years ago or so, where the ISO written to USB booted fine, but when burned to optical media wouldn't boot anything including VM. It was a bootloader bug, if I recall correctly - pretty sure it hit BIOS firmware only, not UEFI. But yeah it does sound reasonable to have the same "if it's known to be broken" then block, similar to the request for printing. But if we're gonna do that I think it should be netinstall. That has rescue capability live does not, and it's smaller so it fits the CD and DVD use case broadly, unlike live which is DVD only due to size. Since all the netinstalls are in effect based on boot.iso and are all pretty much identical (branding and default partitioning are differentiated), as long as boot.iso can successfully boot by optical drive, all the editions can have a rescue+installer that'll boot them. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
