On 03/21/2018 05:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > I know this isn't strictly a "test" question. But I think maybe more folks with > greater insight my be lurking here. > > In troubleshooting a kernel update issue on the user's list it was finally determined > that if one erased "grubby" the kernel would not get upgraded properly. RPM would > show the new kernel installed but it would not be in the boot menu and the needed > files would not be in /boot. There is a scriplet error, but it is called "nonfatal". > > I feel this to be a bugzilla. So, my question is, should kernel-core require > /sbin/new-kernel-pkg or should it be a "protected" package in the dnf configuration? > Or something else? Technically yes, the kernel should require new-kernel-pkg since it uses it in the scriptlet. However, this might be a special case, because on some arches we don't use grub2. But perhaps it could be conditionalized. I'd say file a kernel bug or perhaps just mail the kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list to discuss. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
