On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 23:45 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:24:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Is there any chance of running that at, say, > > > https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs-nextrelease/ instead of a > > > local instance? > > > > I mean, in *theory* we could for sure, it's just yet another > > maintenance task for someone, and I'm not jumping up to volunteer for > > it right now...if we could script the update of the instances a bit > > more (right now one of us has to go into the admin UI and update it > > manually every milestone), maybe I'd be more inclined :P > > Is the maintenance headache in installing and running/updating the > service, or is it in this milestone updating? If it's the latter, we > could probably ask Jan to handle it as part of FPgM duties. Would that > help? (Probably for both the "nextrelease" *and* current app.) Well kinda both, though adding a second server doesn't add a *huge* maintenance burden (just a minor annoyance). Rather than just farming the work off onto someone else, though, it'd be more efficient for someone (anyone...) to take a bit of time to automate the milestone and release updates, it shouldn't be *too* crazily difficult to do (though we'd need to find some kind of way to identify when a milestone release happens, I guess). To be clear, if this isn't just an idle thought but a specific request that "yes, blockerbugs-nextrelease would be an extremely useful thing for me, please do it", we probably *can* do that. If that's the case, please file a ticket in fedora-qa pagure and we'll likely get to it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
