On Sat, 2017-07-22 at 01:31 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Bug 1394862's status is CLOSED ERRATA. According to > http://www.dictionary.com/browse/errata?s=t > errata means: > > "1.plural of erratum. > 2.a list of errors and their corrections inserted, usually on a separate page or > slip of paper, in a book or other publication; corrigenda." > > Knowing that definition, I expect a web search to find me a list describing > something about the state of whatever package, applicable to the not yet > released Fedora 26, contains a fix for that bug, but searching found me no such > list. :-( > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_status states a bug with > status ERRATA has a fix that "is available", but I suspect that for this bug and > many others, such status has been applied prematurely/prospectively, confirming > propriety of some kind of available status list. Neither of those is the correct reference; in fact the bugzilla.redhat.com page *specifically states* that it is not the correct reference for Fedora bugs. The correct reference for Fedora bugs is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow : "Once a bug has been fixed and included in a new package in rawhide or the updates repo it should be closed. For a stable or Branched release, the resolution ERRATA should be used. For Rawhide, the resolution RAWHIDE should be used." ERRATA just means there was an update (that is, a Bodhi update) that fixed the bug. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
