On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:22:45 +0200, Alessio Ciregia wrote: > Well, it is true that this request could easily turn into a contest. But > looking at the bug report, it seems this is an always reproducible issue. That remains to be seen. There are websites, which make Firefox crash reproducible for the user, who is affected by the bug, but it cannot be guaranteed that the contents served at the URL are the same for everyone at every location and 24/7, too. Private browsing seems to have an influence. > But if a big part of us are not affected, It's a fallacy to hope for such conclusions. The sample isn't large enough for anyone to conclude that "a big part" of the users isn't affected. There seem to be some bugzilla tickets about "Gah. Your tab just crashed.", such as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1440569 but how many users take the time to submit such a problem report manually? > maybe we need more investigation, > but the bug should not be considered as a blocking one. Only somebody with enough insight (such as intimate knowledge of Firefox) should decide on that. It would be silly to release a broken Firefox, which crashes early for users depending on what websites they visit first or where on this world they live to be affected by ad banners/videos or anything that causes these crashes. _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
