Re: Release validation testers: a question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think availability of images will be essential before anything else can be done well!

However, at present stage, there's an important question from my part, too: What happened about i386 images? The last one I found is from Feb. 8th. Besides my AMD 990FX system, I've an Acer Aspire 1 which in many a way is a machine as well for testing and working as simple in handling. There may be a crowd of other people who like keeping similar good old stuff for evenly getting set up with new Linux software ...


On 2/14/17 9:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks! I've got a question for everyone who helps out with release
validation testing. It's related to the project to build a new system
for submitting those results. We have a ticket for designing that
system:

https://pagure.io/design/issue/483

and as part of the discussion there, we're wondering something. Given
that it's part of the new design that there's some kind of step where
you specify which particular image you're testing, does it make more
sense to you if you choose things in this order:

1. Pick a test to run
2. Pick an image to run the test on

Or this order:

1. Pick an image to test
2. Pick a test to run on the image

? It's pretty important to the design approach. Thanks!

(Please do feel free to read the ticket and mention any other thoughts
you have on the design, too.)
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux