On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 13:57 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > So if "RC-1.8" passes all tests and is a go, how is this renamed? Or > is it not renamed? > I assume you don't want to do a production compose at this point > because then it's a compose that isn't tested, while ostensibly > identical the process has any number of non-deterministic aspects to > it, right? If so, is there an foreseen consequence of just renaming > the filename of the ISOs? Or does the final distributed ISO need to > retain the "RC-1.8" add-on? I believe Dennis' position is that the RC is *exactly what we ship* - we don't rebuild or rename the images. We just sync the entire tree exactly as is into the release location. So it wouldn't be a directory called '24-RC-1.8' or whatever any more, but the image filenames and volume labels would still contain that identifier, if they originally did. > It's sort of a minor point. There are build artifacts now as a single > digit since I think Fedora 20, that don't mean anything to the outside > world (e.g. for workstation it's 21-5, 22-3, 23-10 for the past three > releases). But I don't think they hurt anything really, so if this > RC-1.8 add-on is in the distributed ISO, it's only very slightly > crusty. Right, exactly. -- Adam WilliamsonFedora QA Community MonkeyIRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . nethttp://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
