On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 13:42 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:22:56AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > What I *can't* find is any reference for the justification usually > > cited for the criterion. Several times we mention that there was an > > actual case where people downloaded an Alpha or Beta then got > > confused > > because the background was the same as the previous stable release, > > but > > I've been searching for 15 mins and can't find it. This is probably > > just because it's a difficult thing to search for, though. > > > > It's worth noting that we used to use considerably more 'striking' > > desktop backgrounds than we currently do; the last few releases > > have > > all been fairly subtle variations on the theme of 'abstract shapes > > in > > Fedora blue', really. > > Here's a thought: maybe the Fedora background logo GNOME Shell plugin > could detect if running on an Alpha/Beta release (or on Rawhide) and > change appropriately? That's certainly what I thought would help with the whole backgrounds thing, yes - making it *more* complex and tied to advanced desktop -specific functionality. (you may wish to apply your sarcasm detector to the above sentence :>) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
