On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:22:56AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > What I *can't* find is any reference for the justification usually > cited for the criterion. Several times we mention that there was an > actual case where people downloaded an Alpha or Beta then got confused > because the background was the same as the previous stable release, but > I've been searching for 15 mins and can't find it. This is probably > just because it's a difficult thing to search for, though. > > It's worth noting that we used to use considerably more 'striking' > desktop backgrounds than we currently do; the last few releases have > all been fairly subtle variations on the theme of 'abstract shapes in > Fedora blue', really. Here's a thought: maybe the Fedora background logo GNOME Shell plugin could detect if running on an Alpha/Beta release (or on Rawhide) and change appropriately? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test