On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This seems more appropriate as an anaconda patch than a thread on > test@? I'm not sure what action test@ is expected to take about it. I couldn't produce an anaconda patch if my life depended on it, you know that. And bcl already knows how I feel about this ESP UI, and he disagrees [1]. His view is the user using custom partitioning should know what they are doing, even though reality proves this is overwhelmingly false. Users don't know such things, don't want to know such things, and no good reason/advantage is presented for them knowing such things. So I'm trying to convince you, because you're the one in this bug producing a significant amount of consideration how to polish what I think amounts to a turd. You can't polish this thing, it just has to be ripped out of the UI on UEFI installations - no bootloader options at all ever. Get rid of it. Nothing good has ever come from this choice. Only frustration for all parties, including QA. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022316 [2] pjones tacitly agrees with the configfile idea (1048999) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118580#c6 -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
