On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 18:13 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Adam Williamson < > adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This seems more appropriate as an anaconda patch than a thread on > > test@? I'm not sure what action test@ is expected to take about it. > > I couldn't produce an anaconda patch if my life depended on it, you > know that. And bcl already knows how I feel about this ESP UI, and > he disagrees [1]. His view is the user using custom partitioning > should know what they are doing, even though reality proves this is > overwhelmingly false. Users don't know such things, don't want to > know such things, and no good reason/advantage is presented for them > knowing such things. > > So I'm trying to convince you, because you're the one in this bug > producing a significant amount of consideration how to polish what I > think amounts to a turd. You can't polish this thing, it just has to > be ripped out of the UI on UEFI installations - no bootloader > options at all ever. Get rid of it. Nothing good has ever come from > this choice. Only frustration for all parties, including QA. That bug isn't really a design choice bug. It's a hoary codepath bug. Your concerns in this mail are fairly orthogonal to the specific problem I'm trying to deal with there. I read other mailing lists, y'know. :) You don't have to send something to test@ just to make sure I read it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
