Re: Heads up - Anaconda 22.17 will enforce 'good' passwords

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 09:38:52AM +0000, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Matthias Clasen <mclasen <at> redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > Let me ask now, then: can we make the change to reject 'weak' passwords
> > specific to only those products that enable sshd by default, please ?
> 
> If the only concern is remote attacks, I'd like to see someone answer the
> earlier question about whether Fedora has password rate and retry limits to
> allow a weak password to be adequately secure, and if not, why not fix that
> instead of requiring a strong password?

As someone said on the CentOS list, where, like most places, it's generally
being received unfavorably, this is similar to the security theatre we have
here in the US, where the TSA inconveniences anyone, at will, with little
real effect, but it makes a nice show. 

In my admittedly biased opinion, that's the best description I've seen.
Will it stop one or two events?  Probably.  Is it effective?  No.  Will it
inconvenience the vast majority?  Yes.

Are Fedora users so inexperienced and stupid that it's necessary?  
I don't think so.

-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux