On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 12:59 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > What's the actual, real world, > non-imaginary impetus behind the change? It's exactly what all the list posts I pointed you to say it is. I don't know how to stop the conspiracy virus which causes people to leap to the conclusion that there's some shadowy secret motive behind every change they don't like, but there *isn't*. PJP posted about his change proposal to anaconda-devel . bcl said 'that doesn't sound like a good idea, but we take your point about possible brute force attacks against services enabled ootb, and an easy way to mitigate that is to require strong passwords'. anaconda already *has* a password strength checker, so it probably took him all of five minutes to make it mandatory instead of optional. Then he dropped a mail here as a courtesy heads-up. that's the entirety of what happened. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
