On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 09:25 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote: > Just to sum it up for people, the proposal overall is: > > - Reword the alpha criterion [0] > - add a Beta criterion (with the latest extension) [1] > - add a net-install Final criterion [2] > > I don't see anything worrisome about any of these changes. Gives us > good, well defined areas we know we want covered. So, sigh, we're apparently getting flavor network install images again for F22, along with a generic network install image. So let me refine this *again*: Alpha: "When installing with a release-blocking dedicated installer image, the installer must be able to install the default package set." (no change) Beta 1: "When installing with a dedicated installer image for a specific Fedora flavor, the default package set must be the correct set for that flavor." Beta 2: "When installing with the generic network install image, selecting a package set other than the default must work." Final: "When installing with the generic network install image with no update repositories enabled, the installer must be able to install each of the release-blocking desktops, as well as the minimal package set." that commits us to a moderate amount of testing, and if we're worried about that we could for e.g. consider limiting the 'guarantee' for the generic netinst image to just minimal. Thoughts? Hope I don't have to revise this any further :) (note: the flavor netinsts may offer package set selection and be able to install other package sets - in fact, they probably will - but the idea is we only "support" them for installing their 'own' package sets.) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
