On 12.10.2014 03:57, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:52:02AM +0200, poma wrote: >> >> >> If it so benign as you write, your reactions are very intriguing. >> I wonder what is the true meaning of such. > > This thread is fairly amazing. > > As I see it, you wrote, who made this dumb decision. > You were quickly answered by someone, who said, it was my fault, it was an > accident and it's fixed. > > Furthermore, though that person doesn't need me to defend them, they are > one of the Fedora people who works hard for the users, taking their side > when developers have made some decisions to make the users' lives harder, > worked hard in getting documentation to a point where it's useful, and so > on. > > In my less than humble opinion, their response, oops, sorry, fixed, should > have been the end of it. > > Ok, let's assume that you are better than most of us, and have NEVER EVER > made a foolish mistake at work. Even so, you should find it in your heart > to forgive we mere mortals who have erred. > > It looks to me as if a mistake was made and quickly fixed--again, by > someone who has done so much for Fedora that any error they might make > should be quickly forgiven. > > Nor does this mean that I don't think they are professional--their body of > works shows an extremely high level of professionalism. > > Anyway, contrary to what you first believed, it wasn't a decision, it was > an error. It has been fixed. An apology was made. Said error was made by > someone who constantly shows their value to Fedora. If you were (or are) a boss, > would you fire an extremely valuable and competent employee for one > mistake, or even continue to berate them over it once it was fixed? > > If so, then there's nothing to say. If not, I'm not sure why this isn't > already over. > > Man, Rahul is not a problem here, he honestly answered. poma -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
