On 10.09.2014 01:21, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 01:12 +0200, poma wrote: >> On 13.12.2013 12:37, Rejy M Cyriac wrote: >> ... >>> I differ with you on this point. There are still so many places in the >>> world with limited/expensive/slow, or even no network connectivity at >>> all. In fact, it is only in the developed countries that broadband is >>> prevalent like water, and in the rest of the world, just like water, it >>> is a limited resource. >>> >>> On a related note, folks in the developed world might be surprised to >>> know that 32-bit processors are still very much in use. >>> >>> I work with the Free Media project of Fedora, and I know of so many >>> instances where providing the Fedora DVD (32 and 64 bit) has empowered >>> the lives of people and small organisations. >> >> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/20/Fedora/x86_64[i386]/iso/ >> Fedora-20-x86_64[i386]-DVD.iso >> >> Fedora-21-Standard-x86_64[i386]-DVD.iso >> Whence disappeared in Fedora.next!? > > F21 will not have any generic DVD image. It will have a DVD-type (I'm > trying to call them 'offline' now) image for Server which contains only > the Server package groups. The question of having or not having the DVD > was kicked back and forth quite a bit, I'm not sure why you decided to > just quote one random mail from one thread about it from ten months ago. > QA can't really change that decision, it's a FESCo choice in the end. > All together should read what the man wrote till the moment of the comprehension of the essence of the written. Fedora is a great project, perhaps too great for those who have invented it. poma -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
