----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Todorov" <atodorov@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:51:52 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking > > На 21.02.2014 16:27, Richard W.M. Jones написа: > > Is it correct that you're only going to be filing bugs when upstream > > tarballs already contain test suites, but they are just not enabled in > > the Fedora package? > > Hi Richard, > I meant just the opposite. However I will also do what you suggest but this > will > result in far less number of bugs (probably around 100). > > I want to track which packages *DO NOT* have any tests and later be able to > focus on creating them (be it working with volunteers, GSoC participants or > whoever is willing to step up to this task). These are upstream bugs and having them open in Fedora bz would do no good. While this value is valuable it's not Fedora bug and list of packages that are missing test suites in general would better be kept on e.g. wiki page where volunteers can pick one and work with upstream to add test suite. For packages that has test suites but don't compile/run it's another story. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team > > I don't intend to force package maintainers to write tests if they don't want > to > (or can't). > > > -- > Alex > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
