On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 10:59 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:38:01AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 10:32 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > > They're the same tools, the obefxs source was moved into the obexftp > > > > source tree upstream. > > > > > > I think that if obexftp package will "provide" a high enough version of > > > obexfs then an update will automatically replace it ... > > > > Yes, I know that too. Let me play that tune again, Sam: I'm principally > > asking the question of how the obexfs package should get retired. > > I am afraid that I miss something. The above will retire obexfs. Are > you concerned that an old name is mentioned somewhere in "provides"? > If nothing explicitely requires obexfs then instead you may use > "Obsoletes: ..." in a spec of obexftp and obexfs will vanish. No, it won't 'vanish'. It will still be in the Fedora package repositories. I'm not talking about getting the package removed from *users' systems*. I'm talking about getting it removed from *the Fedora package collection*. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
