On 09.12.2013 13:38, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> On 09.12.2013 12:41, Adam Pribyl wrote: >>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> On 12/08/13 12:05, Christopher Meng wrote: >>>>>> Target to f21: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM >>>>> >>>>> Thanks.... I thought the target was F20 since it was in all the previous >>>>> test releases. I guess this is a good explanation .... >>>>> >>>>> SDDM is now lacking some functionality compared to KDM, namely XDMCP, VNC >>>>> and >>>>> multi-seat support. They are planned to be added. >>>> >>>> Martin Briza, the KDE SIG guys is working a lot on XDMCP and multi seat >>>> support >>>> - not sure what support is already there. But the initial idea behind >>>> switching >>>> to SDDM was - it works pretty well for standard use cases, everyone who >>>> needs >>>> more features can switch back to KDE. In the end - even these standard >>>> usecases >>>> were not covered very well, so it was postponed to F21. KDM really has to >>>> die, >>>> it's dead for several years now... >>> >>> Hm, so GDM is useless for XDMCP, multiseat, multihead and long user lists, >>> KDM is dead, but still usable, switching to SDDM is fine for standard use >>> case on desktop but lacking XDMCP and multiseat... this does not sound >>> very good to me. >> >> Very detailed, >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LightDM >> It is not clear why they do not want to use it!? > > http://aseigo.blogspot.cz/2013/03/logging-into-plasma-workspaces-2.html > > It's a bit Mir vs Wayland, Canonical CLA and that SDDM feels "native" to Qt > guys. But as far as I know, there was no final call. OK I see. I assume therefore that the Qt port and continue from there is not a valuable option. Thanks for the link. poma -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
