----- Original Message ----- > On 09.12.2013 12:41, Adam Pribyl wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> On 12/08/13 12:05, Christopher Meng wrote: > >>>> Target to f21: > >>>> > >>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM > >>> > >>> Thanks.... I thought the target was F20 since it was in all the previous > >>> test releases. I guess this is a good explanation .... > >>> > >>> SDDM is now lacking some functionality compared to KDM, namely XDMCP, VNC > >>> and > >>> multi-seat support. They are planned to be added. > >> > >> Martin Briza, the KDE SIG guys is working a lot on XDMCP and multi seat > >> support > >> - not sure what support is already there. But the initial idea behind > >> switching > >> to SDDM was - it works pretty well for standard use cases, everyone who > >> needs > >> more features can switch back to KDE. In the end - even these standard > >> usecases > >> were not covered very well, so it was postponed to F21. KDM really has to > >> die, > >> it's dead for several years now... > > > > Hm, so GDM is useless for XDMCP, multiseat, multihead and long user lists, > > KDM is dead, but still usable, switching to SDDM is fine for standard use > > case on desktop but lacking XDMCP and multiseat... this does not sound > > very good to me. > > Very detailed, > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LightDM > It is not clear why they do not want to use it!? http://aseigo.blogspot.cz/2013/03/logging-into-plasma-workspaces-2.html It's a bit Mir vs Wayland, Canonical CLA and that SDDM feels "native" to Qt guys. But as far as I know, there was no final call. Jaroslav > > poma > > > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
