On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 11:17 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 08/20/2013 10:35 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > >> On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>> Following on my little series, we also need to adjust the Base and > >>> Desktop matrices for ARM as primary arch, but the good news is the > >>> changes are pretty simple. > >> As discussed at the QA meeting this morning, I've gone ahead and pushed > >> all the proposed changes so far into 'production'. I'll try and draft up > >> the remaining change for visible cloud ASAP. thanks folks! > > I might have missed something, but is XFCE really non-blocking for ARM? I remember someone saying that XFCE is the most important desktop for them. (and also that GNOME doesn't work almost anywhere). > > From my pov we ( as in the QA community ) really should not be release > blocking on desktop environments. > > However the desktop environments sub-communities might decide for > themselves which arch they support and if they are release blocking for > them and test accordingly. > > I assume we will adopt our release blocking criteria in accordance with > whatever comes out of this ring proposal ( Although I still not seeing > how that proposal actually solves anything for us ), specifically > workstation and which DE it will ship ( which probably will be either > Gnome or KDE ) and drop the requirement for the other one in the process. My take was just to wait and see what really happens for now. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
