On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:18:49 -0700 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ...snip... > We already have test cases for all of these. No need for new ones. ok. How can we denote the ones we desire tested for these? Basic Desktop? > > At the Alpha milestone, all approved spins will be created by > > rel-eng. > > > > Each approved spin MUST have at least 2 people fill in the Basic > > spin test matrix for at least 1 TC or RC. If the image fails, > > maintainers can try again at the next milestone, but the image is > > NOT shipped for that milestone. if an image doesn't get 2 people > > filling in Basic spin tests, the image is dropped for that cycle > > and IS NOT SHIPPED FOR THAT RELEASE! Such images can be reapproved > > by the spins sig for the next cycle. > > I think this is going way too far. ok. > Specifically: I think *one* test for each spin is more realistic. I > don't think we need to block spins for being oversize, or for SELinux > denials. They're spins. I don't think we can overreach on quality > requirements. > > > - Is 2 people too many? Should it just be 1? or More? > > See above. Fair enough. If thats the consensus, thats ok with me. > > - Are there other Basic tests we should require? > > No. That's actually all we require from the *release blocking* live > images at Alpha. > > > - Is there a better way to track things than that wiki page? > > Not at present, no. WikiTCMS isn't so bad once you get used to it. Right. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
