On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:37:01 -0700 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So, just a phrasing thing, the criteria are mostly written in the form > 'XXX must be the case', not 'XXX is added to the blocker list'. So > perhaps: > > 'All bugs deemed by FESCo to block the milestone release must be > fixed.' > > Would be enough. My suggestion used the terms 'issues' and 'addressed' > as weasel words we've found useful before - in the case where we work > around a bug, rather than fixing it, we can call that 'addressing' it > - but I don't really mind writing it that way and just using Common > Sense (tm). I think specifying FESCo's current decision-making > mechanism - majority vote - in the criterion is a mistake, as it's at > least theoretically plausible that FESCo could change its > decision-making mechanism in future, and then the criterion would > need to be updated for no good reason. All that matters to the > blocker process is that 'FESCo Hath Deemed It Thus'. The mechanism by > which FESCo Deems things is out of scope. Sure. Works for me. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
