On 2013-06-21 10:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:37:01 -0700
Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, just a phrasing thing, the criteria are mostly written in the form
'XXX must be the case', not 'XXX is added to the blocker list'. So
perhaps:
'All bugs deemed by FESCo to block the milestone release must be
fixed.'
Would be enough. My suggestion used the terms 'issues' and 'addressed'
as weasel words we've found useful before - in the case where we work
around a bug, rather than fixing it, we can call that 'addressing' it
- but I don't really mind writing it that way and just using Common
Sense (tm). I think specifying FESCo's current decision-making
mechanism - majority vote - in the criterion is a mistake, as it's at
least theoretically plausible that FESCo could change its
decision-making mechanism in future, and then the criterion would
need to be updated for no good reason. All that matters to the
blocker process is that 'FESCo Hath Deemed It Thus'. The mechanism by
which FESCo Deems things is out of scope.
Sure. Works for me.
As there were no objections, I'm adding this to the Alpha page as I
create the F20 criteria pages. Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
