Re: gnome-shell cpu usage during installation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> F19:
>> direct rendering: Yes
>> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on NV84
>>    GL_MESA_texture_signed_rgba, GL_NV_conditional_render, GL_NV_depth_clamp,
>>    GL_MESA_window_pos, GL_NV_blend_square, GL_NV_conditional_render,
>
> I'm unsure what it means for GL_NV_conditional_render to be listed twice, and for GL_AMD_conservative_depth to be listed for F18 but not F19.
>
> It looks like conservative_depth is an optimization, but I have no idea if it matters to gnome-shell.
> http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/AMD/conservative_depth.txt

This is completely irrelevant. If you want to find out whats going on
install debug info packages for gnome-shell, mutter, clutter, cogl,
mesa and X.
Install sysprof and run sysprof to see where the cpu time is spent.
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux