On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 08:47 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 04/24/2013 05:23 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> > >> "but must not do so when running as a live image." <--- makes no sense > >> and should be removed > > > > Er? It makes perfect sense. We don't want to encourage people to run a > > system update when booting live; this will just result in RAM > > exhaustion. So we disable the update checks in the boot scripts of the > > live image kickstarts. > > My concern is with users with live usb and persistent storage I'm pretty > sure they would like to get update notifications. Unfortunately we can't do much about that case (except make livecd-iso-to-disk reverse the customizations in the kickstart when writing a persistent storage device, which sounds...eww), and it's the minority case. > >> For F20 we should start looking into adding containers ( libvirt lxc ) > >> to the beta criteria along with test cases for it > > > > Why do you pick out containers in particular? Is this a particularly > > important area of functionality for the future? > > There are several benefits of using containers instead of virtualzation. > bare metal performance, less storage space etc. so I would say yes. > > I would think we should be focusing on testing all the connection > options in virt-manager and those are xen,qemu/kvm and lxc ( linux > containers ) Seems reasonable to test all those, but I gotta admit I haven't seen much use of LXC in the wild, it doesn't seem like something people are clamoring for. Any others on the list particularly keen on LXC? Am I missing the latest hot thing? :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
