Re: Revised Beta criteria up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/24/2013 05:08 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Just a heads-up, folks - I completed the Beta criteria revisions, following the general model from Alpha (as previously discussed in thread "Major criteria re-write / re-design proposal"), and put the revised version into place just in time for tomorrow's first Beta blocker review meeting. Of course, please call out any errors / omissions etc! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Beta_Release_Criteria

Kickstart delivery section needs some clarification as in "'Available' defined by installer team" we should display there what are the valid and supported combination of options

The recommend part should be stripped out of "virtualization technology" since we should cover both KVM and XEN ( we ship both )

Xen even shares "Fedora-virt-preview.repo" and you use the libvirt/virt-tools for it

It would be good for us to track down who recommend only kvm and cite that if we are going to be "recommending" it

"Release-blocking desktops must notify the user of available updates, but must not do so when running as a live image. "

"but must not do so when running as a live image." <--- makes no sense and should be removed

For F20 we should start looking into adding containers ( libvirt lxc ) to the beta criteria along with test cases for it

JBG
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux