On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 21:05 +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 18:34 +0100, drago01 wrote: > > > >> > Even if we assume that gets done for F19, we have something like 400+ > >> > layouts in the installer now. We can fudge the criterion at > >> > interpretation time and say 'well it's okay if just one or two really > >> > obscure ones are broken' but it might be nice if we could build that > >> > into the criterion itself - one of the complaints people have about the > >> > process currently is that there are cases where you have to 'know what > >> > the criterion really means', and it'd be nice to avoid as many of those > >> > as possible going forward. > >> > >> How about defining a list of ones that must work? i.e to define what > >> "obscure" means. > > > > A hard list feels unwieldy (sorry to be awkward). A simple kludge is the > > layouts associated with the languages listed on the welcome screen. Or > > the alternative approach is just to try and word a bit of wiggle room > > into the way the criterion is written...if you can't think of a way to > > do that I can take a cut at it later, maybe... > > OK feel free to try it just shouldn't be too vague in the sense "we > care about keyboard layouts" without any specifics. Proposal: replace all criteria with "We care! We care a lot!" -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
