On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 18:34 +0100, drago01 wrote: > >> > Even if we assume that gets done for F19, we have something like 400+ >> > layouts in the installer now. We can fudge the criterion at >> > interpretation time and say 'well it's okay if just one or two really >> > obscure ones are broken' but it might be nice if we could build that >> > into the criterion itself - one of the complaints people have about the >> > process currently is that there are cases where you have to 'know what >> > the criterion really means', and it'd be nice to avoid as many of those >> > as possible going forward. >> >> How about defining a list of ones that must work? i.e to define what >> "obscure" means. > > A hard list feels unwieldy (sorry to be awkward). A simple kludge is the > layouts associated with the languages listed on the welcome screen. Or > the alternative approach is just to try and word a bit of wiggle room > into the way the criterion is written...if you can't think of a way to > do that I can take a cut at it later, maybe... OK feel free to try it just shouldn't be too vague in the sense "we care about keyboard layouts" without any specifics. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
