On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 18:34 +0100, drago01 wrote: > > Even if we assume that gets done for F19, we have something like 400+ > > layouts in the installer now. We can fudge the criterion at > > interpretation time and say 'well it's okay if just one or two really > > obscure ones are broken' but it might be nice if we could build that > > into the criterion itself - one of the complaints people have about the > > process currently is that there are cases where you have to 'know what > > the criterion really means', and it'd be nice to avoid as many of those > > as possible going forward. > > How about defining a list of ones that must work? i.e to define what > "obscure" means. A hard list feels unwieldy (sorry to be awkward). A simple kludge is the layouts associated with the languages listed on the welcome screen. Or the alternative approach is just to try and word a bit of wiggle room into the way the criterion is written...if you can't think of a way to do that I can take a cut at it later, maybe... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
