> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:03:20 -0500,
> John.Florian@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> >I wasn't expecting this behavior -- figured livecd-creator would be as
> >before or better. I guess for now I need to boot with selinux=0 unless
> >someone has any suggestions for this problem.
>
> It's normally better to use permissive mode than to disable selinux. You
> won't be required to relabel to turn selinux on. You will get logs of
> what accesses are being blocked, so that you can provide a better report
> on the problem and use a local policy fix if desired to work around
> the issue.
Yeah, if I was actually worried about security in this case, that would've been my usual approach. I had it turned off to bring greater visibility to other errors long before F18 alpha and was waiting for this BZ to move along before worrying further about SELinux again.
So do I just need to do a relabel at this point?
--
John Florian
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
