On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:46:50 -1000, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines > > > > Thanks! > > > > Well I never knew about that handy little tool. Thanks for pointing that > out, knocked out a bunch of them. Here's a very important part of the Update Feedback Guidelines every tester ought to understand: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines#Previously_reported_bugs | Previously reported bugs | | If your testing uncovers no problems but you see that another tester has | identified a serious problem with the package, please try to replicate | their problem, and post negative feedback if you are now able to confirm | it. | | If you are not able to confirm the problem but you suspect this may be | because you cannot recreate the necessary conditions, please post neutral (!) | feedback noting that you were unable to duplicate the problem. Only post | positive feedback if you are sure your testing indicates the other | reporter's negative feedback is a mistake. If we don't adhere to these guidelines, we would be vote against eachother often. Please be very careful with your feedback in bodhi if you see that previous testers have voted -1 already. -- Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow) - Linux 3.6.7-5.fc18.x86_64 loadavg: 0.00 0.01 0.05 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
