On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 09:59 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:46:50 -1000, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > Well I never knew about that handy little tool. Thanks for pointing that > > out, knocked out a bunch of them. > > Here's a very important part of the Update Feedback Guidelines every > tester ought to understand: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines#Previously_reported_bugs > > | Previously reported bugs > | > | If your testing uncovers no problems but you see that another tester has > | identified a serious problem with the package, please try to replicate > | their problem, and post negative feedback if you are now able to confirm > | it. > | > | If you are not able to confirm the problem but you suspect this may be > | because you cannot recreate the necessary conditions, please post neutral (!) > | feedback noting that you were unable to duplicate the problem. Only post > | positive feedback if you are sure your testing indicates the other > | reporter's negative feedback is a mistake. > > If we don't adhere to these guidelines, we would be vote against eachother > often. Please be very careful with your feedback in bodhi if you see that > previous testers have voted -1 already. Thanks, Michael, that is indeed important. fedora-easy-karma shows all existing comments, so it's easy enough to check through them before filing your vote. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
